Trojan Horse.

Morning, Threaders, Threadheads, and all in between. Black coffee in the storm.

Secular.

The behavior free from religious or spiritual beliefs that guarantees every religion the right to exist is often considered by religious people a negative attitude, more so if they are extreme believers. Usually they complain about it by claiming the exact opposite of what it does, accusing it of restricting religious activity. Bullocks.

Secularism is the umpire that prevents religions from fighting each other to the death in search of hegemonic purity, as defined in each of their holy books. The restrictions it imposes on religions are of political nature, meant to allow each to thrive equally without interfering with the policies society lives by as a whole. The only activity secularism restricts from religions is political activity, something one would expect postmodernists to cheer.

The enthusiastic deconstruction of norms and standards à la Derrida, initiated by the dawn of the last century, misjudged the back door built in the anti binary construct that would allow for clever agents to infiltrate it and corrode it from within: relativism. But they were directed at Western institutions they identified as culprits in the making of an unbalanced world, such as colonial power and Christianity (the twin enfant terribles behind the creation of the Third World).

The basic tenets of postmodernism crumbled under the weight and influence of relativism as soon as it became cultural. Cultural relativism erased every shred of subjectivism and created a sense of cultural identity far from diverse and inclusive, quite the opposite. The exact same things condemned and excised from Western thought were not only permissible but celebrated in the societies Europeans initially dominated and later made up by drawing lines on maps.

Because those societies were victims of modern Europe, they got a pass on modernity itself and were allowed to fester in medieval limbo as a reward for the suffering and injustice initiated by the Crusades and perpetuated by each Cruise missile and drone strike, precision be damned. XXI century warfare still has not shrugged the previous age bellicisms and, of course, all “resistance” is justified and objectively condoned. Relatively speaking, of course.

Postmodernism became a regressive movement through the excesses of cultural relativism that fights with equal fervor the teaching of Christian and Jewish values and the attempts to exclude Muslim ones from academia. The same movement that sought to remove the sword from Christianity (and Judaism) places it firmly and joyfully in the hands of Islam, oblivious to the fact it will undoubtedly be used to strike it down. Cultural relativism is the well fitting suicide vest of the West.

This reality has yet to find an objective secular response that both denounces it and rejects it as inevitable. Like the idiotic protestors who cosplay suicide bombers with fake explosives they believe the suicide vest they strapped to themselves won’t explode. It’s just a prop to get the point across, not a real thing. And yet, all these mostly atheist activists are doing is to glorify and promote the end of what allows them to foolishly celebrate their own demise.

They became what they should despise and are actively destroying the secular societies that gave them freedom of speech as they uphold the exact opposite values like their lives depend on it while walking voluntarily towards their own deaths. A death cult has managed to instill its ideal into those who started out to destroy the very notion of cultists in our society. The back door is wide open and they’re walking right through it.

As we face the challenges posed by an increasingly authoritarian regime, and the threats to our very lives posed by their insanity, we have to confront this reality without reservations. The best way to do it is to recognize cultural relativism as the Trojan Horse it is. Yes, we cheered it and brought it inside our walls ourselves but it’s not too late to destroy it. Objectively.

Is that all there is?

Morning, Threaders, Threadheads, and all in between. More coffee.

Mr. Booker goes to Washington.

25 hours and 4 minutes was what it took for a black Senator to break the previous record for filibustering, held by segregationist Strom Thurmond since 1957, who used it to try to stop the Civil Rights Act that year. Cory Booker did a man’s job and stood up for all of us. What was achieved?

At the 24 hour 19 minute mark, Chuck Schumer interrupted Booker for a question, which Booker initially denied, but good old Chuck didn’t yield and asked if he knew Thurmond’s record had been broken to thunderous applause in the chamber. It was a moment worthy of recognition. Throughout the filibuster many Democratic Senators chipped in with questions, prefaced by deserved words of gratitude and praise for Booker, lauding him as an example to follow.

Cory Booker’s historic filibuster will go down in Congress records as a victory of the black man over the segregationist, right versus wrong, as it should. Unlike the infamous previous record, however, the procedure it broke for the amount of time it lasted will not deserve more than a footnote, since he was not really filibustering the passage of a bill, rather making use of his time to raise awareness to the state of our nation under this administration.

Basically, he stopped the Senate’s “business” for 25 hours and 4 minutes, and in doing so sparked the imagination of people who have been demanding action from Congress to stand up for them. It was a big deal. We need Congress Democrats to stand up like he did, more and more. Will they? I hope so. I hope this extraordinary feat leads to more than an incentive to break his record, like some isolated sports statistic. A curiosity in the Guinness Book of Records.

Although I appreciate the momentousness of the occasion, I couldn’t help but to cringe hearing Shumer’s schmuck voice asking that; asking if Booker realized he just made the Guinness Book. It made it look like that’s all there was to it. And if that’s all there is, like Peggy Lee sang, let’s break out the booze and have a ball. Right? The first thing that happened in the Senate right after Booker’s record breaking speech was the vote to confirm Matt Whitaker as ambassador to NATO.

That was the “business” Booker’s filibuster was holding: to confirm the “toilet guy” as our representative in NATO. Cloture had already been voted on before without noticeable opposition, the vote itself got unanimous consent to proceed. Just another missed opportunity to delay and obstruct the actions of this administration. The footnote no one will notice under Cory Booker’s historic achievement; not exactly the Civil Rights Act of 1957, is it.

Whitaker’s confirmation got a yes vote from the Democrat Jeanne Shaheen, while another Democrat, Pat Murray, didn’t vote. Just business as usual in the US Senate, after a 25 hour stand for what is right. Does it matter? After last night’s Florida election for the House of Representatives, when the chance to flip two seats was unsurprisingly lost, looks like we’re in the same place, even if Wisconsin saved the night, to Elon Musk’s chagrin.

Cory Booker’s timing was picked to coincide with those elections and it captured national attention and headlines for the duration. It was not used to stall or oppose any landmark legislation but ALL legislative processes that enable this administration’s wrecking ball policies. It can and should be used every single time, whether the order of business is cutting Medicaid or confirming some “toilet guy” to a government position. It doesn’t matter. Every single time.

Cory Booker didn’t just find out some extraordinary way to interfere with Senate business. It was there to be used each time another sycophant was confirmed. It was not. Will it be used again? Will Democrats learn to use it at every turn, or will they sit around and wait for 2026 as Schumer proposed, with an occasional vote in favor of the other side? The 25 hour filibuster was an extraordinary use of an ordinary Congress rule: as long as a Senator holds the floor nothing else matters.

In an age of advertising political campaigns, where fancy buses and merchandising, tv ads and more and more open bribery substitute policy and ideas, it’s essential to shine a bright light on the issues people are voting for.  Capturing the news cycle attention for extended periods of time while pursuing that objective is a very effective way of doing just that. That is the lesson Booker learned from John Lewis. That’s the necessary good trouble we need.

The people are grateful for Cory Booker’s exceptional action and are now more galvanized. One can hope Congress Democrats learn from it and choose, like him, to take a stand whenever they can, for as long as possible, every single time. Time will tell. Time we unfortunately don’t have plenty of. Here’s hoping this is not all there is.